Commentary: Voting yes on Prop 1 is good for outdoor spaces, businesses
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Letter: Michigan governors: Support state’s natural assets this November
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Proposal 1 will protect Michigan’s parks, wildlife and water
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Opinion | Why Michigan land conservation leaders support Proposal 1
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Proposal 1 ballot measure would change rules on Michigan parks fund
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Midland Business Alliance hopes voters OK Prop 1
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Public lands money on ballot
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Proposal One: Voters to decide cap of state public park funding
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Election 2020: Here’s what you need to know about Proposal 1
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.
Changes proposed for Michigan natural resources trust fund
In addition to casting votes for the presidency and a slew of federal, state and local offices, Michigan voters will be deciding the fate of two statewide proposals sent to the ballot by the state legislature.
Both Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 would change Michigan’s Constitution — one would change how Michigan’s Natural Resources Trust Fund works to allow for more flexibility on funding state and local park projects, and the other would define electronic data as private property, meaning state and local law enforcement would need a warrant before searching a person’s emails or phone records.
Lawmakers already voted these measures out of both chambers, but any changes to the Michigan Constitution must also be approved by voters.
Read on to learn more about both measures and what their passage would mean for the state.